P.G.V.C.L KOTDASANGANI vs BHIKHABHAI DANABHAI TOLIYA USER SHAILESHBHAI MAGANBHAI PATANI — 121/2025

Case under Gujarat Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1979 Section 03. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 30th April 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJRJ030019632025

Filing Number

121/2025

Filing Date

02-Dec-2025

Registration No

121/2025

Registration Date

02-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KOTDA SANGANI

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

30-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1979 Section 03

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.G.V.C.L KOTDASANGANI

    Adv. M C DAVE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHIKHABHAI DANABHAI TOLIYA USER SHAILESHBHAI MAGANBHAI PATANI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary This is a recovery suit (RCS No. 121/2025) filed by Western Gujarat Vidyut Company Limited against a consumer for unpaid electricity bills. The court partially allowed the plaintiff's claim, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 35,111 (Rupees Thirty-five Thousand One Hundred Eleven) with 6% annual interest from the date of the claim until payment, while rejecting the plaintiff's request for 18% interest and costs. The court found the evidence supports the outstanding electricity charges but deemed the higher interest rate unjustified under current banking standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 121/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a recovery suit (RCS No. 121/2025) filed by Western Gujarat Vidyut Company Limited against a consumer for unpaid electricity bills. The court partially allowed the plaintiff's claim, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 35,111 (Rupees Thirty-five Thousand One Hundred Eleven) with 6% annual interest from the date of the claim until payment, while rejecting the plaintiff's request for 18% interest and costs. The court found the evidence supports the outstanding electricity charges but deemed the higher interest rate unjustified under current banking standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case