P.G.V.C.L KOTDASANGANI vs BABULAL BHALABHAI BABARIYA — 116/2025

Case under Gujarat Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1979 Section 03. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJRJ030019582025

Filing Number

116/2025

Filing Date

02-Dec-2025

Registration No

116/2025

Registration Date

02-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KOTDA SANGANI

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1979 Section 03

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.G.V.C.L KOTDASANGANI

    Adv. M C DAVE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BABULAL BHALABHAI BABARIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary of RCS NO. 116/2025 The court partially allowed Western Gujarat Vidyut Company's claim against the defendant for recovery of ₹28,425 (principal amount) plus 6% annual interest on unpaid electricity bills from April 2023 to April 2024. The court found the defendant liable for unauthorized electricity consumption and directed payment of the claimed amount with interest, while rejecting the claim for 18% interest rate and directing each party to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 28-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 116/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of RCS NO. 116/2025 The court partially allowed Western Gujarat Vidyut Company's claim against the defendant for recovery of ₹28,425 (principal amount) plus 6% annual interest on unpaid electricity bills from April 2023 to April 2024. The court found the defendant liable for unauthorized electricity consumption and directed payment of the claimed amount with interest, while rejecting the claim for 18% interest rate and directing each party to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case