DIVYESHBHAI HIRABHAI CHANGELA DIRECTOR OF VISHAL BEARINGS vs PRATIKBHAI BIPINBHAI SHAH — 38/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 02nd May 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJRJ030007802024

Case disposed

Filing Number

38/2024

Filing Date

28-06-2024

Registration No

38/2024

Registration Date

28-06-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, KOTDA SANGANI

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

02nd May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 Section 34

Petitioner(s)

DIVYESHBHAI HIRABHAI CHANGELA DIRECTOR OF VISHAL BEARINGS

Adv. R A SHUKLA

Respondent(s)

PRATIKBHAI BIPINBHAI SHAH

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

02-05-2026

Disposed

18-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

11-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

10-02-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

09-01-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Final Orders / Judgements

02-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court partially allowed the plaintiff's insurance claim. The plaintiff, a limited company, sought recovery of Rs. 4,61,688 (including interest and expenses) from the defendant for fraudulently collected insurance premiums on six motor vehicles and unpaid glass replacement costs. The court ruled that the defendant must repay the fraudulently collected amount of Rs. 3,80,192 plus glass replacement cost of Rs. 81,496, with 6% annual interest, while holding the defendant liable for all case costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court partially allowed the plaintiff's insurance claim. The plaintiff, a limited company, sought recovery of Rs. 4,61,688 (including interest and expenses) from the defendant for fraudulently collected insurance premiums on six motor vehicles and unpaid glass replacement costs. The court ruled that the defendant must repay the fraudulently collected amount of Rs. 3,80,192 plus glass replacement cost of Rs. 81,496, with 6% annual interest, while holding the defendant liable for all case costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KOTDA SANGANI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case