JITENDRAKUMAR VRUJLAL HIRANI PARTNER OF GANGA AGRO FOODS INDUSTRIES vs NANALAL BHAGWANJIBHAI GOR Advocate - K N MORI — 10/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJRJ030007592023
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
10/2023
Filing Date
10-03-2023
Registration No
10/2023
Registration Date
10-03-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, KOTDA SANGANI
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JITENDRAKUMAR VRUJLAL HIRANI PARTNER OF GANGA AGRO FOODS INDUSTRIES
Adv. V T DUDANI, P B GOSAI
Respondent(s)
NANALAL BHAGWANJIBHAI GOR Advocate - K N MORI
P.G.V.C.L SHAPAR VERAVAL
Adv. M C DAVE
DEPUTY ENGINEER PGVCL SHAPAR
Adv. M C DAVE
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 11-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 18-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 28-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 07-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction application by Ganga Agro Food Industries partnership firm against former partner Nanalal Gor. The court prohibited Gor from applying to the power distribution company (PGVCL) for disconnection of the firm's electricity connection (consumer number 81907/01324/3) until the suit's conclusion. The court found the firm had established a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored the plaintiffs, and disconnection would cause irreparable business losses that cannot be compensated monetarily. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction application by Ganga Agro Food Industries partnership firm against former partner Nanalal Gor. The court prohibited Gor from applying to the power distribution company (PGVCL) for disconnection of the firm's electricity connection (consumer number 81907/01324/3) until the suit's conclusion. The court found the firm had established a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored the plaintiffs, and disconnection would cause irreparable business losses that cannot be compensated monetarily. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts