P.G.V.C.L KOTDASANGANI vs MANJIBHAI GIGABHAI SOLANKI — 40/2025

Case under Gujarat Public Moneys (recovery of Dues) Act, 1979 Section 03. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 07th April 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJRJ030003862025

Case disposed

Filing Number

40/2025

Filing Date

18-04-2025

Registration No

40/2025

Registration Date

18-04-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KOTDA SANGANI

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

07th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT PUBLIC MONEYS (RECOVERY OF DUES) ACT, 1979 Section 03

Petitioner(s)

P.G.V.C.L KOTDASANGANI

Adv. M C DAVE

Respondent(s)

MANJIBHAI GIGABHAI SOLANKI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

07-04-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

28-01-2026

ISSUES

02-12-2025

SUMMONS - NOTICE

03-11-2025

SUMMONS - NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

07-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary RCS NO. 40/2025 - This civil suit involves Western Gujarat Vij Company Ltd (plaintiff) seeking recovery of outstanding electricity bills totaling Rs. 64,535 from the defendant. The court partially allowed the claim, directing the defendant to pay the principal amount with 6% annual interest from the date of filing until recovery, while rejecting the plaintiff's demand for 18% interest. The court emphasized that absent an explicit agreement between parties, only statutory interest rates apply, and consequently dismissed the claim for the higher interest rate sought by the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary RCS NO. 40/2025 - This civil suit involves Western Gujarat Vij Company Ltd (plaintiff) seeking recovery of outstanding electricity bills totaling Rs. 64,535 from the defendant. The court partially allowed the claim, directing the defendant to pay the principal amount with 6% annual interest from the date of filing until recovery, while rejecting the plaintiff's demand for 18% interest. The court emphasized that absent an explicit agreement between parties, only statutory interest rates apply, and consequently dismissed the claim for the higher interest rate sought by the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KOTDA SANGANI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case