P.G.V.C.L KOTDASANGANI vs MANJIBHAI GIGABHAI SOLANKI — 40/2025
Case under Gujarat Public Moneys (recovery of Dues) Act, 1979 Section 03. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 07th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJRJ030003862025
Filing Number
40/2025
Filing Date
18-04-2025
Registration No
40/2025
Registration Date
18-04-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KOTDA SANGANI
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.G.V.C.L KOTDASANGANI
Adv. M C DAVE
Respondent(s)
MANJIBHAI GIGABHAI SOLANKI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
ISSUES
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 28-01-2026 | ISSUES |
| 02-12-2025 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 03-11-2025 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary RCS NO. 40/2025 - This civil suit involves Western Gujarat Vij Company Ltd (plaintiff) seeking recovery of outstanding electricity bills totaling Rs. 64,535 from the defendant. The court partially allowed the claim, directing the defendant to pay the principal amount with 6% annual interest from the date of filing until recovery, while rejecting the plaintiff's demand for 18% interest. The court emphasized that absent an explicit agreement between parties, only statutory interest rates apply, and consequently dismissed the claim for the higher interest rate sought by the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary RCS NO. 40/2025 - This civil suit involves Western Gujarat Vij Company Ltd (plaintiff) seeking recovery of outstanding electricity bills totaling Rs. 64,535 from the defendant. The court partially allowed the claim, directing the defendant to pay the principal amount with 6% annual interest from the date of filing until recovery, while rejecting the plaintiff's demand for 18% interest. The court emphasized that absent an explicit agreement between parties, only statutory interest rates apply, and consequently dismissed the claim for the higher interest rate sought by the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts