P.G.V.C.L KOTDASANGANI vs HASMUKHBHAI GOVINDBHAI VAGHELA — 30/2025
Case under Gujarat Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1979 Section 03. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 07th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJRJ030003762025
Filing Number
30/2025
Filing Date
18-Apr-2025
Registration No
30/2025
Registration Date
18-Apr-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KOTDA SANGANI
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Last updated 16-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.P.G.V.C.L KOTDASANGANI
Adv. M C DAVE
Respondent(s)
-
1.HASMUKHBHAI GOVINDBHAI VAGHELA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Court Decision The Gujarat High Court (RCS No. 30/2025) partially allowed the plaintiff company's suit against the defendant for recovery of pending electricity charges amounting to ₹16,706.00 with interest. The court awarded 6% annual interest on the principal amount from the date of filing until full recovery, rejecting the plaintiff's claim for 18% interest as unjustified. The court also directed each party to bear their own litigation costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Jan-2026
Issues
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Dec-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Nov-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Jul-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 30/2025
Summary of Court Decision The Gujarat High Court (RCS No. 30/2025) partially allowed the plaintiff company's suit against the defendant for recovery of pending electricity charges amounting to ₹16,706.00 with interest. The court awarded 6% annual interest on the principal amount from the date of filing until full recovery, rejecting the plaintiff's claim for 18% interest as unjustified. The court also directed each party to bear their own litigation costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts