PRABHABEN GIRDHARBHAI D/o BHIMJIBHAI BECHARBHAI KANKADIYA vs CHATURABEN BHIMJIBHAI KANKADIYA Advocate - D.M.MEHTA — 42/2015
Case under Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Section 6. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJRJ030000542015
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
42/2015
Filing Date
14-07-2015
Registration No
42/2015
Registration Date
14-07-2015
Court
TALUKA COURT, KOTDA SANGANI
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRABHABEN GIRDHARBHAI D/o BHIMJIBHAI BECHARBHAI KANKADIYA
Adv. N.J.RATHOD
Respondent(s)
CHATURABEN BHIMJIBHAI KANKADIYA Advocate - D.M.MEHTA
VIJYABEN BHIMJIBHAI KANKADIYA
BHAVNABEN BHIMJIBHAI KANKADIYA
ARVINDBHAI BHIMJIBHAI KANKADIYA
MANOJBHAI BHIMJIBHAI KANKADIYA
JAYSHREEBEN BHIMJIBHAI KANKADIYA
MANSHUBHAI BHIMJIBHAI KANKADIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 08-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 11-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 28-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 07-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: RCS/42/2015 Court: Gujarat High Court (Kutch District) Outcome: The court partially allowed the plaintiff's appeal challenging a decree. The court set aside an earlier order preventing the plaintiff from obtaining a declaratory judgment and ruled that the plaintiff has a legitimate first appearance case with valid grounds for relief. However, the court imposed restrictions on defendants 4, 5, and 7 from transferring or disposing of the disputed agricultural land pending final resolution of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: RCS/42/2015 Court: Gujarat High Court (Kutch District) Outcome: The court partially allowed the plaintiff's appeal challenging a decree. The court set aside an earlier order preventing the plaintiff from obtaining a declaratory judgment and ruled that the plaintiff has a legitimate first appearance case with valid grounds for relief. However, the court imposed restrictions on defendants 4, 5, and 7 from transferring or disposing of the disputed agricultural land pending final resolution of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts