THE GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs MANSUKHBHAI GOVINDBHAI SAGATHIYA — 48119/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),118(1),352,54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ020631482025
Filing Number
48119/2025
Filing Date
24-09-2025
Registration No
48119/2025
Registration Date
24-09-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT RAJKOT
Judge
1-8TH ADDL CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11208037250298
Police Station
KUVADAVA Road POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Respondent(s)
MANSUKHBHAI GOVINDBHAI SAGATHIYA
ROHITBHAI GOVINDBHAI SAGATHIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-8TH ADDL CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 05-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 03-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Judgment The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court of Rajkot acquitted the two accused defendants under criminal charges including IPC Sections 115(2), 118(1), 352, 506, and J.P. Act Section 135. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a sufficiently credible case based on the evidence presented—particularly noting inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony and lack of corroborating physical or medical evidence to prove the allegations of assault and criminal intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court Judgment The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court of Rajkot acquitted the two accused defendants under criminal charges including IPC Sections 115(2), 118(1), 352, 506, and J.P. Act Section 135. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a sufficiently credible case based on the evidence presented—particularly noting inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony and lack of corroborating physical or medical evidence to prove the allegations of assault and criminal intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts