ANSH ABHAYKUMAR BHARDWAJ vs NIL — 1707/2023
Case under Succession Act,indian 1925 Section 372. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 30th April 2026.
CMA SC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - SR/CIVIL/SMALL CAUSE COU
CNR: GJRJ020150422023
Filing Number
1707/2023
Filing Date
20-06-2023
Registration No
1707/2023
Registration Date
20-06-2023
Court
CIVIL COURT RAJKOT
Judge
6-17th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANSH ABHAYKUMAR BHARDWAJ
Adv. S D VORA
Respondent(s)
NIL
Hearing History
Judge: 6-17th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 10-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 25-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Rajkot court granted Ansh Abhaykumar Bharadwaj's application for a Heirship Certificate under the Bombay Regulation Act, 1827, recognizing him as the rightful heir to deceased Abhaykumar Ganpatram Bharadwaj (who died intestate in 2020). The court found the applicant's claim valid after no objections were filed following public notice, and other heirs consented to the grant. The certificate covers 100% of immovable properties No. 1 and 3, 50% of property No. 2, and 100% of movable properties, though the order only acknowledges heirship and does not determine final property rights or partition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Rajkot court granted Ansh Abhaykumar Bharadwaj's application for a Heirship Certificate under the Bombay Regulation Act, 1827, recognizing him as the rightful heir to deceased Abhaykumar Ganpatram Bharadwaj (who died intestate in 2020). The court found the applicant's claim valid after no objections were filed following public notice, and other heirs consented to the grant. The certificate covers 100% of immovable properties No. 1 and 3, 50% of property No. 2, and 100% of movable properties, though the order only acknowledges heirship and does not determine final property rights or partition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts