JADEJA HARENDRASINH BAHADURSINH vs THE GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT — 1436/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 20th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJRJ020088152026

Filing Number

1436/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1436/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT RAJKOT

Judge

3-7Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

Decision Date

20-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11208044260081

Police Station

PRADUMAN NAGAR POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JADEJA HARENDRASINH BAHADURSINH

    Adv. C D SANKALIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court granted the petitioner Jadeja Harendrasinh Bahadursinh's application to recover his seized Realme C-8P mobile phone during the investigation stage of a gambling case (IPC Section 12), finding that he established ownership through affidavit and that prolonged police custody would damage the device. The court ordered release of the mobile subject to specified conditions including furnishing bail, undertaking not to use it for unlawful purposes, and producing it before the court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    7Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1436/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted the petitioner Jadeja Harendrasinh Bahadursinh's application to recover his seized Realme C-8P mobile phone during the investigation stage of a gambling case (IPC Section 12), finding that he established ownership through affidavit and that prolonged police custody would damage the device. The court ordered release of the mobile subject to specified conditions including furnishing bail, undertaking not to use it for unlawful purposes, and producing it before the court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case