BHARATBHAI RAMESHBHAI SOLANKI vs HIRUBEN SOMABHAI PARDHI — 79/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 39. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 20th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJRJ020064382024
Filing Number
79/2024
Filing Date
12-Mar-2024
Registration No
79/2024
Registration Date
12-Mar-2024
Court
CIVIL COURT RAJKOT
Judge
4-9Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
Last updated 16-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHARATBHAI RAMESHBHAI SOLANKI
Adv. K N MORI
-
2.RAMESHBHAI MADHABHAI SOLANKI
Respondent(s)
-
1.HIRUBEN SOMABHAI PARDHI
-
2.MUKESHBHAI SOMABHAI PARDHI
Case History
-
20-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
11-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
9Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
20-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
9Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
11-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
9Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
17-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
9Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
09-Oct-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
9Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
20-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
9Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
15-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
9Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
12-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
9Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
30-Aug-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
9Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
23-Jul-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
9Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
10-Jul-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
9Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
12-Jun-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
14Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
08-May-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
11Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
19-Apr-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
11Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
09-Apr-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
11Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
19-Mar-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
11Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
13-Mar-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
11Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
28-Feb-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
11Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
30-Jan-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
11Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
08-Jan-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
11Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
19-Dec-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
11Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
28-Nov-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
11Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
14-Nov-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
11Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
07-Nov-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
11Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
18-Oct-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
11Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
27-Sep-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
16th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
12-Aug-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
16th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
05-Jul-2024
Order On Injuction Application
17th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
18-Jun-2024
OrderView PDF
-
18-Jun-2024
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff in a property sale dispute. The plaintiff had paid Rs. 5,50,000/- as advance to the defendants for a house purchase under a registered agreement dated March 4, 2023, but the defendants breached the agreement by refusing to execute the sale deed and attempting to sell the property elsewhere. The court found the plaintiff had a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored granting the injunction, and the plaintiff would suffer irreparable loss if not protected. The defendants are restrained from transferring the property to any third party until final disposal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2024
Order On Injuction Application
17th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
04-Jun-2024
Order On Injuction Application
17th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
28-May-2024
Summons - Notice
21st Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
17-May-2024
Summons - Notice
21st Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
03-May-2024
Summons - Notice
21st Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
26-Apr-2024
Summons - Notice
21st Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
12-Apr-2024
Summons - Notice
21st Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
16-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 79/2024
Case Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff in a property sale dispute. The plaintiff had paid Rs. 5,50,000/- as advance to the defendants for a house purchase under a registered agreement dated March 4, 2023, but the defendants breached the agreement by refusing to execute the sale deed and attempting to sell the property elsewhere. The court found the plaintiff had a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored granting the injunction, and the plaintiff would suffer irreparable loss if not protected. The defendants are restrained from transferring the property to any third party until final disposal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts