YOGENDRASINH RAGHUVIRSINH VALA vs ARVINDSINH VIBHAJI JADEJA — 38/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 35,37. Status: Hearing On Injunction Application. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJRJ020028942025
Filing Number
38/2025
Filing Date
29-Jan-2025
Registration No
38/2025
Registration Date
29-Jan-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT RAJKOT
Judge
4-9Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
Last updated 16-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.YOGENDRASINH RAGHUVIRSINH VALA
Adv. S R JOSHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.ARVINDSINH VIBHAJI JADEJA
-
2.GIRDHARBHAI LALJIBHAI SORATHIYA
Case History
-
06-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-Apr-2026
Hearing On Injunction Application
9Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
04-Apr-2026
Hearing On Injunction Application
9Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing On Injunction Application
9Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
20-Feb-2026
Hearing On Injunction Application
9Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
30-Jan-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: The 9th Additional Civil Judge, Rajkot dismissed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction seeking to restrain the defendants from interfering with the suit property (a residential plot in Rajkot, Gujarat). The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as he provided no cogent documentary evidence to prove his claimed 20-year possession or his right to the property through adverse possession. The court held that bare assertions without proper documentation cannot justify granting an interim injunction, and since the balance of convenience was not in the plaintiff's favor, the application was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Jan-2026
Hearing On Injunction Application
9Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
24-Sep-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
9Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
28-Aug-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
9Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
17-Jul-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
9Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
23-Jun-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
9Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
28-Apr-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
10th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
29-Mar-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
10th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
17-Mar-2025
Summons - Notice
10th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
04-Mar-2025
Summons - Notice
10th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
01-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 38/2025
Summary: The 9th Additional Civil Judge, Rajkot dismissed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction seeking to restrain the defendants from interfering with the suit property (a residential plot in Rajkot, Gujarat). The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as he provided no cogent documentary evidence to prove his claimed 20-year possession or his right to the property through adverse possession. The court held that bare assertions without proper documentation cannot justify granting an interim injunction, and since the balance of convenience was not in the plaintiff's favor, the application was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts