YOGENDRASINH RAGHUVIRSINH VALA vs ARVINDSINH VIBHAJI JADEJA — 38/2025

Summary: The 9th Additional Civil Judge, Rajkot dismissed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction seeking to restrain the defendants from interfering with the suit property (a residential plot in Rajkot, Gujarat). The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as he provided no cogent documentary evidence to prove his claimed 20-year possession or his right to the property through adverse possession. The court held that bare assertions without proper documentation cannot justify granting an interim injunction, and since the balance of convenience was not in the plaintiff's favor, the application was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.