SINDHU RAMCHANDRABHAI BODANA vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT — 668/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJRJ010017882026
Filing Number
668/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
668/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT RAJKOT
Judge
2-9th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11201018260009
Police Station
CID CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION - GANDHINAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SINDHU RAMCHANDRABHAI BODANA
Adv. A N JANANI
Respondent(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Hearing History
Judge: 2-9th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The 9th Additional Sessions Judge at Rajkot granted regular bail to applicant Sindhu S/o. Ramchandra Bodana in a crypto fraud case involving ₹3.16 crore. The court found that while the applicant was implicated based on a witness statement, there was insufficient prima facie evidence of his direct involvement—he allegedly received only ₹4,400 with no proven economic benefits. The judge noted the investigation was likely complete since arrest (12-02-2026), making continued detention pretrial punishment, especially given the applicant's lack of criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The 9th Additional Sessions Judge at Rajkot granted regular bail to applicant Sindhu S/o. Ramchandra Bodana in a crypto fraud case involving ₹3.16 crore. The court found that while the applicant was implicated based on a witness statement, there was insufficient prima facie evidence of his direct involvement—he allegedly received only ₹4,400 with no proven economic benefits. The judge noted the investigation was likely complete since arrest (12-02-2026), making continued detention pretrial punishment, especially given the applicant's lack of criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts