ASHISH alias AMIT VAJESINH PARMAR vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - DGP — 661/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJRJ010017712026

Case disposed

Filing Number

661/2026

Filing Date

05-03-2026

Registration No

661/2026

Registration Date

05-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT RAJKOT

Judge

2-9th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11208044260158

Police Station

PRADUMAN NAGAR POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 118(2)
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) POLICE ACT, 1951 Section 135(1)
SCHEDULED CASTS AND THE SCHEDULED TRIBES (PREVENTION OF TROCITIES) ACT, 1989 Section 3,(2)(5-a)

Petitioner(s)

ASHISH alias AMIT VAJESINH PARMAR

Adv. R B PURNVAIRAGI

Respondent(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - DGP

RAJNISHBHAI LAXMANBHAI SONDARVA

Hearing History

Judge: 2-9th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

13-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The 9th Additional Sessions Judge at Rajkot rejected the regular bail application of 19-year-old Ashish Parmar, who was accused of beating a complainant with knife blows causing eight serious injuries on vital body parts. The court found that the applicant had a substantial role in the offense—allegedly motivated by grudge after being removed from his security guard position—and that the injuries were severe enough to conclude the complainant remained in danger despite hospital discharge. The court determined there was no basis to exercise discretion in favor of bail given the gravity of injuries, investigation stage, and risk of witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The 9th Additional Sessions Judge at Rajkot rejected the regular bail application of 19-year-old Ashish Parmar, who was accused of beating a complainant with knife blows causing eight serious injuries on vital body parts. The court found that the applicant had a substantial role in the offense—allegedly motivated by grudge after being removed from his security guard position—and that the injuries were severe enough to conclude the complainant remained in danger despite hospital discharge. The court determined there was no basis to exercise discretion in favor of bail given the gravity of injuries, investigation stage, and risk of witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT RAJKOT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case