BHUPATBHAI DHIRUBHAI SARIYA vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT — 659/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJRJ010017692026
Filing Number
659/2026
Filing Date
05-Mar-2026
Registration No
659/2026
Registration Date
05-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT RAJKOT
Judge
2-9th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 16-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11213021260137
Police Station
JASDAN POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHUPATBHAI DHIRUBHAI SARIYA
Adv. K L SAKARIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The 9th Additional Sessions Judge at Rajkot granted regular bail to Bhupatbhai Dhirubhai Sariya in a criminal case involving charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023. The court found that the applicant was not named in the original FIR, had no criminal antecedents, and the investigation was substantially complete, making continued detention constitute pretrial punishment. Bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 25,000 with a surety of equal amount, subject to standard conditions including non-tampering with evidence and regular court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
9th Addl District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 659/2026
Summary The 9th Additional Sessions Judge at Rajkot granted regular bail to Bhupatbhai Dhirubhai Sariya in a criminal case involving charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023. The court found that the applicant was not named in the original FIR, had no criminal antecedents, and the investigation was substantially complete, making continued detention constitute pretrial punishment. Bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 25,000 with a surety of equal amount, subject to standard conditions including non-tampering with evidence and regular court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts