RAVIRAJ VADUBHAI KHACHAR vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - DGP — 640/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJRJ010016612026
Filing Number
640/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
640/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT RAJKOT
Judge
9-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11208002260049
Police Station
AJI DEM POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAVIRAJ VADUBHAI KHACHAR
Adv. P M JADEJA
MANISHBHAI KAMLESHBHAI PARMAR
Respondent(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - DGP
Hearing History
Judge: 9-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 09-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Rajkot granted regular bail to two accused (Raviraj Vaghubuai Khachar and Mirshubuai aka Gugu) in CRMA No. 640/2026 under CrPC Section 483. The court found that investigation was substantially complete, other co-accused had already been released on bail, and prolonged custody could result in pre-trial conviction. The accused were released on bail of ₹15,000 each with conditions including cooperation with investigation, not tampering with witnesses, and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Rajkot granted regular bail to two accused (Raviraj Vaghubuai Khachar and Mirshubuai aka Gugu) in CRMA No. 640/2026 under CrPC Section 483. The court found that investigation was substantially complete, other co-accused had already been released on bail, and prolonged custody could result in pre-trial conviction. The accused were released on bail of ₹15,000 each with conditions including cooperation with investigation, not tampering with witnesses, and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts