SHAILESHBHAI LAKHMANBHAI ALIAS KALUBHAI ZAPADA vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - DGP — 635/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJRJ010016222026

Case disposed

Filing Number

635/2026

Filing Date

28-02-2026

Registration No

635/2026

Registration Date

28-02-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT RAJKOT

Judge

2-9th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213042220584

Police Station

PADDHARI POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483
INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 302,201,120B
SCHEDULED CASTS AND THE SCHEDULED TRIBES (PREVENTION OF TROCITIES) ACT, 1989 Section 3,(2)(5)
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) POLICE ACT, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

SHAILESHBHAI LAKHMANBHAI ALIAS KALUBHAI ZAPADA

Adv. B V DODIYA

Respondent(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - DGP

JENTIBHAI GHELABHAI GOHEL

Hearing History

Judge: 2-9th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

12-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

HEARING

09-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The 9th Additional Sessions Judge at Rajkot rejected the bail application of Shaileshbhai Laxmanbhai, accused of murder (IPC §302), destruction of evidence (§201), and criminal conspiracy (§120B) in connection with a death allegedly motivated by his wife's affair with the victim. The court found that the applicant had a substantial role in the alleged conspiracy and murder, and that material witnesses remain to be examined in the ongoing trial, creating a genuine risk of bail jumping and witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The 9th Additional Sessions Judge at Rajkot rejected the bail application of Shaileshbhai Laxmanbhai, accused of murder (IPC §302), destruction of evidence (§201), and criminal conspiracy (§120B) in connection with a death allegedly motivated by his wife's affair with the victim. The court found that the applicant had a substantial role in the alleged conspiracy and murder, and that material witnesses remain to be examined in the ongoing trial, creating a genuine risk of bail jumping and witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT RAJKOT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case