JAYGANESH SHIVGNANAM PILLAI vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - DGP — 609/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJRJ010015822026
Filing Number
609/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
609/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT RAJKOT
Judge
2-9th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 16-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11201018260009
Police Station
CID CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION - GANDHINAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAYGANESH SHIVGNANAM PILLAI
Adv. D B TRIVEDI
Respondent(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - DGP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Court Decision Summary The 9th Additional Sessions Judge at Rajkot allowed the bail application of Jayganesh Shivagyanam Pillai, arrested in a crypto fraud case involving ₹3.16 crore. The court found that while the applicant was named during investigation, there was weak prima facie evidence against him—he had no criminal record, investigation was substantially complete after his arrest, and continued detention would constitute pretrial punishment. The court granted bail on ₹15,000 bond with conditions including passport surrender and residence restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
9th Addl District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
9th Addl District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
9th Addl District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
9th Addl District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
9th Addl District Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Hearing
9th Addl District Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 609/2026
Court Decision Summary The 9th Additional Sessions Judge at Rajkot allowed the bail application of Jayganesh Shivagyanam Pillai, arrested in a crypto fraud case involving ₹3.16 crore. The court found that while the applicant was named during investigation, there was weak prima facie evidence against him—he had no criminal record, investigation was substantially complete after his arrest, and continued detention would constitute pretrial punishment. The court granted bail on ₹15,000 bond with conditions including passport surrender and residence restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts