SAMIR ALIAS NAVAZ RAHIMBHAI DODHIYA vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - DGP — 605/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJRJ010015402026

Case disposed

Filing Number

605/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

605/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT RAJKOT

Judge

9-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11208052250945

Police Station

BHAKTINAGAR POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 308(2),61(2)
PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT, 2012 Section 8,12

Petitioner(s)

SAMIR ALIAS NAVAZ RAHIMBHAI DODHIYA

Adv. R B MAKWANA

Respondent(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - DGP

RAYBEN BHAGVANJIBHAI HUMBAL

Hearing History

Judge: 9-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

11-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

ORDER

03-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: CRMA No. 605/2026 The Rajkot Additional Sessions Court granted regular bail to accused Sameer (alias Waz Rahimbhai Dodhiya) in a case involving serious charges under IPC sections 308(2), 61(2), and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. The court imposed strict conditions including furnishing ₹15,000 bail bond, mandatory court attendance, passport deposit, address verification, and restrictions on leaving India without court permission until trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMA No. 605/2026 The Rajkot Additional Sessions Court granted regular bail to accused Sameer (alias Waz Rahimbhai Dodhiya) in a case involving serious charges under IPC sections 308(2), 61(2), and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. The court imposed strict conditions including furnishing ₹15,000 bail bond, mandatory court attendance, passport deposit, address verification, and restrictions on leaving India without court permission until trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT RAJKOT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case