MUSTAK GULAMHUSENBHAI CHAVDA vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - DGP — 604/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJRJ010015392026

Filing Number

604/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

604/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT RAJKOT

Judge

5-5th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11208056201108

Police Station

THORALA POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439(2)
Indian Penal Code Section 323,324,325,504,143,147,148,149
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUSTAK GULAMHUSENBHAI CHAVDA

    Adv. H M HERANJA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - DGP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Rajkot Sessions Court granted permission to the accused Mustak Gulamhusein Chavda to obtain a passport on specified conditions, despite a pending criminal case against him. The court held that a citizen's constitutional right to obtain a passport cannot be denied merely because a criminal case is pending, provided the passport authority complies with central government guidelines and the applicant furnishes an indemnity bond and undertakes not to leave India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    5th Addl District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Order

    5th Addl District Judge

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 604/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Rajkot Sessions Court granted permission to the accused Mustak Gulamhusein Chavda to obtain a passport on specified conditions, despite a pending criminal case against him. The court held that a citizen's constitutional right to obtain a passport cannot be denied merely because a criminal case is pending, provided the passport authority complies with central government guidelines and the applicant furnishes an indemnity bond and undertakes not to leave India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case