MUSTAK GULAMHUSENBHAI CHAVDA vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - DGP — 604/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJRJ010015392026

Case disposed

Filing Number

604/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

604/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT RAJKOT

Judge

5-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11208056201108

Police Station

THORALA POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 Section 439(2)
INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 323,324,325,504,143,147,148,149
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) POLICE ACT, 1951 Section 135(1)

Petitioner(s)

MUSTAK GULAMHUSENBHAI CHAVDA

Adv. H M HERANJA

Respondent(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - DGP

Hearing History

Judge: 5-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

11-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

ORDER

03-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Rajkot Sessions Court granted permission to the accused Mustak Gulamhusein Chavda to obtain a passport on specified conditions, despite a pending criminal case against him. The court held that a citizen's constitutional right to obtain a passport cannot be denied merely because a criminal case is pending, provided the passport authority complies with central government guidelines and the applicant furnishes an indemnity bond and undertakes not to leave India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Rajkot Sessions Court granted permission to the accused Mustak Gulamhusein Chavda to obtain a passport on specified conditions, despite a pending criminal case against him. The court held that a citizen's constitutional right to obtain a passport cannot be denied merely because a criminal case is pending, provided the passport authority complies with central government guidelines and the applicant furnishes an indemnity bond and undertakes not to leave India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT RAJKOT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case