RAVABHAI VIRABHAI KHER vs Government of Gujarat — 395/2025
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJPT130014032025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
395/2025
Filing Date
30-12-2025
Registration No
395/2025
Registration Date
30-12-2025
Court
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT - RADHANPUR
Judge
2-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
0024
Police Station
SHANKHESHWAR POLICE STATION - PATAN DISTRICT
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAVABHAI VIRABHAI KHER
Adv. B P THAKKAR
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat
VIHABHAI BHEMABHAI RABARI ETC .6
Adv. B K PANCHAL
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 11-02-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS | |
| 31-01-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS | |
| 15-01-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed the applicant's delay condonation application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, condoning a 174-day delay in filing a Criminal Revision Application. The court found that revision applications are a statutory right and that the applicant's circumstances (lack of legal knowledge, paralysis, and no private advocate) justified the delay, especially since the State and other opponents raised no objection to condonation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed the applicant's delay condonation application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, condoning a 174-day delay in filing a Criminal Revision Application. The court found that revision applications are a statutory right and that the applicant's circumstances (lack of legal knowledge, paralysis, and no private advocate) justified the delay, especially since the State and other opponents raised no objection to condonation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts