( VANAKAR ) PARMAR PACHANBHAI SAVABHAI vs COLLECTORSHRI,PATAN Advocate - S H THAKKER — 10/2022

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

CMA DC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - DISTRICT COURT

CNR: GJPT130006742022

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

10/2022

Filing Date

13-07-2022

Registration No

10/2022

Registration Date

13-07-2022

Court

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT - RADHANPUR

Judge

2-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

LIMITATION ACT, 1963 Section 5,

Petitioner(s)

( VANAKAR ) PARMAR PACHANBHAI SAVABHAI

Adv. B M MAKWANA

(VANAKAR ) PARAMAR MANGUBEN PACHANBHAI

Adv. B M MAKAWANA

Respondent(s)

COLLECTORSHRI,PATAN Advocate - S H THAKKER

D.Y COLLECTORSHRI,SAMI

Adv. S H THAKKER

EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE SHRI,SANKHESHWAR

Adv. S H THAKKER

ZALA JILUJI PRABHATSHINH

ZALA VIJAYABA JILUJI

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

07-03-2026

Disposed

07-02-2026

REPLY

20-01-2026

REPLY

30-12-2025

REPLY

15-12-2025

REPLY

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
ORDER

The Additional District Judge of Patan allowed the applicants' application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, condoning a 12-day delay in filing their Regular Civil Appeal against a rejected suit. The court found the delay reasonable given the applicants' lack of legal knowledge and agricultural commitments, and since the opponents raised no objection, directed the registry to register the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional District Judge of Patan allowed the applicants' application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, condoning a 12-day delay in filing their Regular Civil Appeal against a rejected suit. The court found the delay reasonable given the applicants' lack of legal knowledge and agricultural commitments, and since the opponents raised no objection, directed the registry to register the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT - RADHANPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case