BHAVSANGBHAI GANDABHAI KATHADIYA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - S K PATEL — 56/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJPT130001032026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
56/2026
Filing Date
07-02-2026
Registration No
56/2026
Registration Date
07-02-2026
Court
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT - RADHANPUR
Judge
1-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11217027260014
Police Station
RADHANPUR POLICE STATION - PATAN DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHAVSANGBHAI GANDABHAI KATHADIYA
Adv. D C THAKKAR
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - S K PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 05-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 25-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 19-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Judge at Radhanpur granted anticipatory bail to Bhavsangbhai Gandabhai Kathadiya, accused of rape and coercion under BNS sections 64(1), 351(1), 351(3), and 54. The court found that the FIR was filed three months after the alleged incident without sufficient explanation, the parties had a prior relationship and voluntarily performed a registered marriage, and no court-ordered divorce existed to dissolve the marriage. The applicant was released on a personal bond of ₹25,000 with strict conditions including cooperation with investigation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Sessions Judge at Radhanpur granted anticipatory bail to Bhavsangbhai Gandabhai Kathadiya, accused of rape and coercion under BNS sections 64(1), 351(1), 351(3), and 54. The court found that the FIR was filed three months after the alleged incident without sufficient explanation, the parties had a prior relationship and voluntarily performed a registered marriage, and no court-ordered divorce existed to dissolve the marriage. The applicant was released on a personal bond of ₹25,000 with strict conditions including cooperation with investigation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts