BHAVSANGBHAI GANDABHAI KATHADIYA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - S K PATEL — 56/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJPT130001032026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

56/2026

Filing Date

07-02-2026

Registration No

56/2026

Registration Date

07-02-2026

Court

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT - RADHANPUR

Judge

1-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11217027260014

Police Station

RADHANPUR POLICE STATION - PATAN DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 482,

Petitioner(s)

BHAVSANGBHAI GANDABHAI KATHADIYA

Adv. D C THAKKAR

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - S K PATEL

Hearing History

Judge: 1-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

09-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

ORDER

05-03-2026

HEARING

25-02-2026

HEARING

19-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
ORDER

The Additional Sessions Judge at Radhanpur granted anticipatory bail to Bhavsangbhai Gandabhai Kathadiya, accused of rape and coercion under BNS sections 64(1), 351(1), 351(3), and 54. The court found that the FIR was filed three months after the alleged incident without sufficient explanation, the parties had a prior relationship and voluntarily performed a registered marriage, and no court-ordered divorce existed to dissolve the marriage. The applicant was released on a personal bond of ₹25,000 with strict conditions including cooperation with investigation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge at Radhanpur granted anticipatory bail to Bhavsangbhai Gandabhai Kathadiya, accused of rape and coercion under BNS sections 64(1), 351(1), 351(3), and 54. The court found that the FIR was filed three months after the alleged incident without sufficient explanation, the parties had a prior relationship and voluntarily performed a registered marriage, and no court-ordered divorce existed to dissolve the marriage. The applicant was released on a personal bond of ₹25,000 with strict conditions including cooperation with investigation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT - RADHANPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case