MUSTUFA MAHAMADBHAI KARDIYA vs PATEL JAYENDRABHAI JAYANTILAL — 60/2022
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 200,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 07th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJPT120013312022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
60/2022
Filing Date
12-08-2022
Registration No
60/2022
Registration Date
12-08-2022
Court
Taluka Court, Saraswati
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MUSTUFA MAHAMADBHAI KARDIYA
Adv. R P BAROT
Respondent(s)
PATEL JAYENDRABHAI JAYANTILAL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT | |
| 15-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT | |
| 01-11-2025 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT | |
| 20-09-2025 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary In CrMA No. 60 of 2022, the Principal Civil Judge dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The applicant failed to appear despite being served notice, and despite two adjournments granted in the interest of justice. The court found that the applicant showed no interest in the proceedings and dismissed the case on 07-03-2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In CrMA No. 60 of 2022, the Principal Civil Judge dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The applicant failed to appear despite being served notice, and despite two adjournments granted in the interest of justice. The court found that the applicant showed no interest in the proceedings and dismissed the case on 07-03-2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts