THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs THAKOR SAVUBHA JALUJI CHHAGANJI Advocate - D R PARMAR — 956/2024

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(F),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPT120011262024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

956/2024

Filing Date

08-08-2024

Registration No

956/2024

Registration Date

08-08-2024

Court

Taluka Court, Saraswati

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11217041240170

Police Station

SARASWATI POLICE STATION - PATAN DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(F),

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

THAKOR SAVUBHA JALUJI CHHAGANJI Advocate - D R PARMAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

09-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

27-02-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

30-01-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

19-12-2025

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court acquitted the defendant Thakari Savubha Jalubha Chharanjhi of charges under Section 65(F) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that while illegal liquor was seized from the defendant's premises, critical procedural deficiencies—including lack of proper witness documentation, missing vehicle details, and weak corroborating evidence—rendered the prosecution's case insufficiently credible to secure conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the defendant Thakari Savubha Jalubha Chharanjhi of charges under Section 65(F) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that while illegal liquor was seized from the defendant's premises, critical procedural deficiencies—including lack of proper witness documentation, missing vehicle details, and weak corroborating evidence—rendered the prosecution's case insufficiently credible to secure conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Taluka Court, Saraswati All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case