THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs THAKOR SAVUBHA JALUJI CHHAGANJI Advocate - D R PARMAR — 956/2024
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(F),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPT120011262024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
956/2024
Filing Date
08-08-2024
Registration No
956/2024
Registration Date
08-08-2024
Court
Taluka Court, Saraswati
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11217041240170
Police Station
SARASWATI POLICE STATION - PATAN DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
THAKOR SAVUBHA JALUJI CHHAGANJI Advocate - D R PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 27-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 30-01-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 19-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the defendant Thakari Savubha Jalubha Chharanjhi of charges under Section 65(F) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that while illegal liquor was seized from the defendant's premises, critical procedural deficiencies—including lack of proper witness documentation, missing vehicle details, and weak corroborating evidence—rendered the prosecution's case insufficiently credible to secure conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the defendant Thakari Savubha Jalubha Chharanjhi of charges under Section 65(F) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that while illegal liquor was seized from the defendant's premises, critical procedural deficiencies—including lack of proper witness documentation, missing vehicle details, and weak corroborating evidence—rendered the prosecution's case insufficiently credible to secure conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts