UTAR GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITED NAYAB IJNER vs LATE DEVABHAI MEGHABHAI PATEL LEGAL HEIRS Advocate - F.M.SHAIKH — 6/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.

Plaintiff Evidence Next hearing 28-Apr-2026 this date has passed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJPT070001762021

Filing Number

6/2021

Filing Date

03-Mar-2021

Registration No

6/2021

Registration Date

03-Mar-2021

Court

TALUKA COURT, RADHANPUR

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UTAR GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITED NAYAB IJNER

    Adv. M.H.MULANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LATE DEVABHAI MEGHABHAI PATEL LEGAL HEIRS Advocate - F.M.SHAIKH

Case History

  1. 28-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  3. 19-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  4. 03-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  5. 18-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  6. 11-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  7. 02-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  8. 02-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  9. 11-Jun-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 30-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 09-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 13-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 09-Dec-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 27-Nov-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 04-Nov-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 05-Oct-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 19-Sep-2024

    OrderView PDF

  18. 19-Sep-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 28-Aug-2024

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary UGVCL v. Patel Ninaben & Others | Additional Civil Judge, Radhanpur | 28.08.2024 The court rejected the defendants' application for rejection of the plaint filed by Uttar Gujarat Vij. Company Ltd. seeking recovery of Rs. 1,09,968/- for unauthorized electricity usage. The defendants argued the suit was time-barred and barred by pending criminal proceedings, but the court held that civil recovery can proceed independently of ongoing criminal cases and the plaint is within limitation. The court found the plaint discloses a valid cause of action and procedural objections are trial issues, not grounds for rejection under CPC Order VII Rule 11. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  20. 28-Aug-2024

    Issues

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 17-Aug-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 06-Aug-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 15-Jul-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 01-Jul-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 18-Apr-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  26. 01-Mar-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  27. 10-Jan-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  28. 22-Nov-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  29. 29-Sep-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  30. 12-Jul-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  31. 31-May-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  32. 21-Apr-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  33. 08-Feb-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  34. 23-Nov-2022

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  35. 14-Sep-2022

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  36. 07-Jul-2022

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  37. 11-May-2022

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  38. 30-Mar-2022

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  39. 10-Feb-2022

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  40. 05-Jan-2022

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  41. 02-Dec-2021

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  42. 28-Oct-2021

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  43. 20-Aug-2021

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  44. 16-Jul-2021

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  45. 19-Apr-2021

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  46. 05-Apr-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  47. 03-Mar-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 6/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary UGVCL v. Patel Ninaben & Others | Additional Civil Judge, Radhanpur | 28.08.2024 The court rejected the defendants' application for rejection of the plaint filed by Uttar Gujarat Vij. Company Ltd. seeking recovery of Rs. 1,09,968/- for unauthorized electricity usage. The defendants argued the suit was time-barred and barred by pending criminal proceedings, but the court held that civil recovery can proceed independently of ongoing criminal cases and the plaint is within limitation. The court found the plaint discloses a valid cause of action and procedural objections are trial issues, not grounds for rejection under CPC Order VII Rule 11. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case