U.G.V.C.L. OFFICE SUB DIVISION OFFICE SAMI AUTHORISIED OFFICER K.C.PATEL vs BALOCH JMALKHAN RUSTAMKHAN — 17/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 23rd April 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJPT040003012025

Case disposed

Filing Number

17/2025

Filing Date

09-05-2025

Registration No

17/2025

Registration Date

09-05-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SAMI

Judge

2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

23rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 9

Petitioner(s)

U.G.V.C.L. OFFICE SUB DIVISION OFFICE SAMI AUTHORISIED OFFICER K.C.PATEL

Adv. M K MAKWANA

Respondent(s)

BALOCH JMALKHAN RUSTAMKHAN

Hearing History

Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

23-04-2026

Disposed

15-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

23-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

11-03-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

23-02-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Final Orders / Judgements

23-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court partially allowed the electricity company's (plaintiff) claim against the customer (defendant) for outstanding electricity dues of ₹21,782.85. The court ruled that the defendant, who failed to appear or contest the case, must pay the outstanding amount plus 6% annual interest from the date of claim until full payment, along with all court costs. The court also ordered the defendant to bear their own legal expenses and upheld the earlier disconnection of the electricity supply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court partially allowed the electricity company's (plaintiff) claim against the customer (defendant) for outstanding electricity dues of ₹21,782.85. The court ruled that the defendant, who failed to appear or contest the case, must pay the outstanding amount plus 6% annual interest from the date of claim until full payment, along with all court costs. The court also ordered the defendant to bear their own legal expenses and upheld the earlier disconnection of the electricity supply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SAMI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case