U.G.V.C.L. OFFICE SUB DIVISION OFFICE SAMI AUTHORISIED OFFICER K.C.PATEL vs BALOCH JMALKHAN RUSTAMKHAN — 17/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 23rd April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJPT040003012025
Filing Number
17/2025
Filing Date
09-05-2025
Registration No
17/2025
Registration Date
09-05-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SAMI
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
U.G.V.C.L. OFFICE SUB DIVISION OFFICE SAMI AUTHORISIED OFFICER K.C.PATEL
Adv. M K MAKWANA
Respondent(s)
BALOCH JMALKHAN RUSTAMKHAN
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 15-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 23-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 23-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court partially allowed the electricity company's (plaintiff) claim against the customer (defendant) for outstanding electricity dues of ₹21,782.85. The court ruled that the defendant, who failed to appear or contest the case, must pay the outstanding amount plus 6% annual interest from the date of claim until full payment, along with all court costs. The court also ordered the defendant to bear their own legal expenses and upheld the earlier disconnection of the electricity supply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court partially allowed the electricity company's (plaintiff) claim against the customer (defendant) for outstanding electricity dues of ₹21,782.85. The court ruled that the defendant, who failed to appear or contest the case, must pay the outstanding amount plus 6% annual interest from the date of claim until full payment, along with all court costs. The court also ordered the defendant to bear their own legal expenses and upheld the earlier disconnection of the electricity supply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts