U.G.V.C.L.SUB DIVISION OFFICE DEPUTY ENGINEER SHRI SOLANKI JATIN VASANTBHAI vs Bhil Parvatiben Kristabhai — 10/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 23rd April 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJPT040000672024

Case disposed

Filing Number

10/2024

Filing Date

29-01-2024

Registration No

10/2024

Registration Date

29-01-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, SAMI

Judge

2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

23rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 1

Petitioner(s)

U.G.V.C.L.SUB DIVISION OFFICE DEPUTY ENGINEER SHRI SOLANKI JATIN VASANTBHAI

Adv. M K MAKWANA

Respondent(s)

Bhil Parvatiben Kristabhai

Hearing History

Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

23-04-2026

Disposed

15-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

23-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

11-03-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

23-02-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Final Orders / Judgements

23-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Decision Summary The court partially allowed the electricity distribution company's (plaintiff) suit against the defendant for recovery of unpaid electricity charges totaling ₹23,827.94 with 16% annual interest from the date of filing until payment. The court drew adverse inferences against the defendant for failing to appear and contest the claims, accepting the plaintiff's documentary evidence including bills and payment records as proof of the outstanding debt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court partially allowed the electricity distribution company's (plaintiff) suit against the defendant for recovery of unpaid electricity charges totaling ₹23,827.94 with 16% annual interest from the date of filing until payment. The court drew adverse inferences against the defendant for failing to appear and contest the claims, accepting the plaintiff's documentary evidence including bills and payment records as proof of the outstanding debt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SAMI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case