PATEL HITESH JAYANTILAL vs PATEL SOHINKUMAR JAYANTILAL Advocate - P K PRAJAPATI — 4181/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPT020060812025

Filing Number

4181/2025

Filing Date

22-Dec-2025

Registration No

4181/2025

Registration Date

22-Dec-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT PATAN

Judge

11-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PATEL HITESH JAYANTILAL

    Adv. B B THAKOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PATEL SOHINKUMAR JAYANTILAL Advocate - P K PRAJAPATI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patan ordered the acquittal and discharge of accused Sohin Kumar Jayantilal Patel from charges under IPC Section 280 and Negotiable Instruments Act Sections 138 and 147. The court permitted withdrawal of the complaint after the complainant and accused reached a settlement, with no further monetary demand, citing the Supreme Court precedent in Rajeev Khandelwal v. State of Maharashtra for justice considerations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Plea

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 22-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4181/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patan ordered the acquittal and discharge of accused Sohin Kumar Jayantilal Patel from charges under IPC Section 280 and Negotiable Instruments Act Sections 138 and 147. The court permitted withdrawal of the complaint after the complainant and accused reached a settlement, with no further monetary demand, citing the Supreme Court precedent in Rajeev Khandelwal v. State of Maharashtra for justice considerations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case