CHAUHAN VARSHABEN JITENDRAKUMAR vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 813/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJPT020056892025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
813/2025
Filing Date
28-11-2025
Registration No
813/2025
Registration Date
28-11-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT PATAN
Judge
11-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHAUHAN VARSHABEN JITENDRAKUMAR
Adv. U G KELA
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
STATE BANK OF INDIA
INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK
Hearing History
Judge: 11-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER/JUDGEMENT
REPLY OF I.O.
REPLY OF I.O.
REPLY OF I.O.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | ORDER/JUDGEMENT | |
| 16-02-2026 | REPLY OF I.O. | |
| 03-02-2026 | REPLY OF I.O. | |
| 21-01-2026 | REPLY OF I.O. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patan allowed the applicant's application under Section 503 of the BNSS and ordered refund of Rs. 19,491/- that was frozen in bank accounts after a cybercrime complaint. The court found the receiving accounts were fake, no FIR was filed, no other claimants appeared, and the Investigating Officer recommended refund. The applicant must furnish a personal bond and surety (1.5x the amount) and comply with conditions including producing the money if demanded and returning it if legitimate claimants appear. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patan allowed the applicant's application under Section 503 of the BNSS and ordered refund of Rs. 19,491/- that was frozen in bank accounts after a cybercrime complaint. The court found the receiving accounts were fake, no FIR was filed, no other claimants appeared, and the Investigating Officer recommended refund. The applicant must furnish a personal bond and surety (1.5x the amount) and comply with conditions including producing the money if demanded and returning it if legitimate claimants appear. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts