NADODA LALITKUMAR LAXMANBHAI vs INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK — 708/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJPT020049732025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

708/2025

Filing Date

17-10-2025

Registration No

708/2025

Registration Date

17-10-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT PATAN

Judge

11-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 503,

Petitioner(s)

NADODA LALITKUMAR LAXMANBHAI

Adv. U G KELA

Respondent(s)

INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK

KOTAK MAHENDARA BANK

Hearing History

Judge: 11-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE

07-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

ORDER/JUDGEMENT

16-02-2026

REPLY OF I.O.

03-02-2026

REPLY OF I.O.

21-01-2026

REPLY OF I.O.

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
ORDER

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patan allowed the applicant's petition under Section 503 of the BNSS to recover Rs. 20,526 that was frozen in bank accounts following a cybercrime complaint filed under Gujarat's Ashwast Project. The court found that the money was stolen from the applicant's SBI account, the recipient bank accounts were fake with no claimants, and the investigating officer recommended refund. The applicant must furnish a personal bond and surety of 1.5 times the amount, with conditions that the money be produced before the court if directed and returned if any other person establishes a legitimate claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patan allowed the applicant's petition under Section 503 of the BNSS to recover Rs. 20,526 that was frozen in bank accounts following a cybercrime complaint filed under Gujarat's Ashwast Project. The court found that the money was stolen from the applicant's SBI account, the recipient bank accounts were fake with no claimants, and the investigating officer recommended refund. The applicant must furnish a personal bond and surety of 1.5 times the amount, with conditions that the money be produced before the court if directed and returned if any other person establishes a legitimate claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT PATAN All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case