NADODA LALITKUMAR LAXMANBHAI vs INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK — 708/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJPT020049732025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
708/2025
Filing Date
17-10-2025
Registration No
708/2025
Registration Date
17-10-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT PATAN
Judge
11-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NADODA LALITKUMAR LAXMANBHAI
Adv. U G KELA
Respondent(s)
INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK
KOTAK MAHENDARA BANK
Hearing History
Judge: 11-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER/JUDGEMENT
REPLY OF I.O.
REPLY OF I.O.
REPLY OF I.O.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | ORDER/JUDGEMENT | |
| 16-02-2026 | REPLY OF I.O. | |
| 03-02-2026 | REPLY OF I.O. | |
| 21-01-2026 | REPLY OF I.O. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patan allowed the applicant's petition under Section 503 of the BNSS to recover Rs. 20,526 that was frozen in bank accounts following a cybercrime complaint filed under Gujarat's Ashwast Project. The court found that the money was stolen from the applicant's SBI account, the recipient bank accounts were fake with no claimants, and the investigating officer recommended refund. The applicant must furnish a personal bond and surety of 1.5 times the amount, with conditions that the money be produced before the court if directed and returned if any other person establishes a legitimate claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patan allowed the applicant's petition under Section 503 of the BNSS to recover Rs. 20,526 that was frozen in bank accounts following a cybercrime complaint filed under Gujarat's Ashwast Project. The court found that the money was stolen from the applicant's SBI account, the recipient bank accounts were fake with no claimants, and the investigating officer recommended refund. The applicant must furnish a personal bond and surety of 1.5 times the amount, with conditions that the money be produced before the court if directed and returned if any other person establishes a legitimate claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts