SHRI RAM FINANCE LTD.LEGAL MANAGER THAKOR BHARATJI H. vs PARMAR DILIPKUMAR AMRATLAL — 3166/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPT020047242025
Filing Number
3166/2025
Filing Date
24-Sep-2025
Registration No
3166/2025
Registration Date
24-Sep-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT PATAN
Judge
11-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 16-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRI RAM FINANCE LTD.LEGAL MANAGER THAKOR BHARATJI H.
Adv. H B PRAJAPATI
Respondent(s)
-
1.PARMAR DILIPKUMAR AMRATLAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
SUMMARY: The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patan, granted permission for withdrawal of the FIR upon settlement between the complainant and accused Dilipkumar Amartlal Parmar. The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Section 280 and Negotiable Instruments Act Sections 147 and 138, citing the Supreme Court precedent in Rajeev Khandelwal v. State of Maharashtra, as both parties reached mutual resolution and the complainant made no further claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Plea
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Plea
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Plea
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
Plea
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
22-Jan-2026
Plea
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
11-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
06-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
06-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3166/2025
SUMMARY: The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patan, granted permission for withdrawal of the FIR upon settlement between the complainant and accused Dilipkumar Amartlal Parmar. The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Section 280 and Negotiable Instruments Act Sections 147 and 138, citing the Supreme Court precedent in Rajeev Khandelwal v. State of Maharashtra, as both parties reached mutual resolution and the complainant made no further claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts