AYAR ARJANBHAI MADEVBHAI vs BANK OF MAHARASHTRA — 487/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJPT020035962025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

487/2025

Filing Date

04-08-2025

Registration No

487/2025

Registration Date

04-08-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT PATAN

Judge

11-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 503,

Petitioner(s)

AYAR ARJANBHAI MADEVBHAI

Adv. U G KELA

Respondent(s)

BANK OF MAHARASHTRA

Hearing History

Judge: 11-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE

07-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

ORDER/JUDGEMENT

16-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT

03-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT

21-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate at Patan allowed the applicant's application under Section 503 of the BNSS, ordering the refund of Rs. 15,000/- that was fraudulently withdrawn from the applicant's SBI account in a cyber crime case and frozen in a suspect bank account. The court found that since no FIR was lodged, no arrests made, no other claimants emerged despite passage of time, and the investigating officer opined positively for refund, the applicant was entitled to the money. The refund is conditional on furnishing a personal bond and surety, with provisions for return if any legitimate claimant emerges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate at Patan allowed the applicant's application under Section 503 of the BNSS, ordering the refund of Rs. 15,000/- that was fraudulently withdrawn from the applicant's SBI account in a cyber crime case and frozen in a suspect bank account. The court found that since no FIR was lodged, no arrests made, no other claimants emerged despite passage of time, and the investigating officer opined positively for refund, the applicant was entitled to the money. The refund is conditional on furnishing a personal bond and surety, with provisions for return if any legitimate claimant emerges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT PATAN All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case