PRAJAPATI HASMUKHBHAI HARGOVANBHAI vs BHIL SHAILESHKUMAR VAGHAJI Advocate - K P RAVAL — 1522/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPT020021412024

Filing Number

1522/2024

Filing Date

23-May-2024

Registration No

1522/2024

Registration Date

23-May-2024

Court

CIVIL COURT PATAN

Judge

11-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAJAPATI HASMUKHBHAI HARGOVANBHAI

    Adv. B C RAVAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHIL SHAILESHKUMAR VAGHAJI Advocate - K P RAVAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Chief Judicial Magistrate at Patan permitted the withdrawal of the FIR and acquitted the accused Shaileshkumar Vagaji Bhil of charges under CrPC Section 257 and Negotiable Instruments Act Sections 138 and 147, as the complainant and accused reached a settlement and the complainant sought withdrawal of the case. The court relied on the Supreme Court's decision in Rajeev Khandelwal v. State of Maharashtra to grant this relief in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  7. 01-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  8. 29-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  9. 01-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  10. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  11. 20-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  12. 02-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  13. 06-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  14. 01-May-2025

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  15. 29-Mar-2025

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  16. 07-Mar-2025

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  17. 05-Mar-2025

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  18. 19-Feb-2025

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  19. 07-Feb-2025

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  20. 03-Jan-2025

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  21. 14-Dec-2024

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  22. 05-Dec-2024

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  23. 13-Nov-2024

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  24. 19-Oct-2024

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  25. 12-Sep-2024

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  26. 09-Aug-2024

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  27. 18-Jul-2024

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  28. 20-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 23-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1522/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate at Patan permitted the withdrawal of the FIR and acquitted the accused Shaileshkumar Vagaji Bhil of charges under CrPC Section 257 and Negotiable Instruments Act Sections 138 and 147, as the complainant and accused reached a settlement and the complainant sought withdrawal of the case. The court relied on the Supreme Court's decision in Rajeev Khandelwal v. State of Maharashtra to grant this relief in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case