RAMI DIPIKABEN W/o CHANDRAKANT vs IRFAN — 186/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJPT020010502026

Filing Number

186/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

186/2026

Registration Date

19-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT PATAN

Judge

11-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMI DIPIKABEN W/o CHANDRAKANT

    Adv. U G KELA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.IRFAN

  2. 2.NOT MENTIONED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patan allowed the applicant's petition under Section 503 of BNSS and ordered refund of Rs. 38,304.98/- that was frozen in bank accounts following a cyber fraud case where Rs. 65,000/- was withdrawn from her account. The court found the frozen accounts were fake with no claimants or objections raised, and directed the banks to transfer the amount to the applicant's original account upon furnishing personal bond and surety, subject to conditions including return if any other person proves their claim over the money. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 186/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patan allowed the applicant's petition under Section 503 of BNSS and ordered refund of Rs. 38,304.98/- that was frozen in bank accounts following a cyber fraud case where Rs. 65,000/- was withdrawn from her account. The court found the frozen accounts were fake with no claimants or objections raised, and directed the banks to transfer the amount to the applicant's original account upon furnishing personal bond and surety, subject to conditions including return if any other person proves their claim over the money. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case