Government of Gujarat vs BHIL MADHUBEN KESHAJI URFE SHAKARJI — 730/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPT020009262026

Filing Number

730/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

730/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT PATAN

Judge

11-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11217019250822

Police Station

A DIVISION POLICE STATION - PATAN DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHIL MADHUBEN KESHAJI URFE SHAKARJI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patan convicted the accused Madhubben under Section 65-AA of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for illegally possessing country liquor on 26/11/2025. The court sentenced her to a fine of Rs. 200 or, in default, two days simple imprisonment, taking into account her poverty, status as the sole earner for her family, and that this was her first offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 730/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patan convicted the accused Madhubben under Section 65-AA of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for illegally possessing country liquor on 26/11/2025. The court sentenced her to a fine of Rs. 200 or, in default, two days simple imprisonment, taking into account her poverty, status as the sole earner for her family, and that this was her first offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case