Government of Gujarat vs PRAJAPATI JIGARBHAI PRAVINBHAI — 714/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPT020009042026

Filing Number

714/2026

Filing Date

07-Feb-2026

Registration No

714/2026

Registration Date

07-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT PATAN

Judge

11-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11217019250644

Police Station

A DIVISION POLICE STATION - PATAN DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRAJAPATI JIGARBHAI PRAVINBHAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patan convicted Jigarabhai Prajapati under the Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) for public drunkenness on 27/09/2025. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime before the court. Considering the accused's poor financial circumstances, first-time offense, remorse, and reliance on precedent judgment, the court imposed a lenient sentence below the statutory minimum: a fine of ₹300 or three days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 714/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patan convicted Jigarabhai Prajapati under the Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) for public drunkenness on 27/09/2025. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime before the court. Considering the accused's poor financial circumstances, first-time offense, remorse, and reliance on precedent judgment, the court imposed a lenient sentence below the statutory minimum: a fine of ₹300 or three days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case