Government of Gujarat vs BHIL MADHUBEN KESHAJI — 694/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPT020008822026

Filing Number

694/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

694/2026

Registration Date

06-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT PATAN

Judge

11-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11217019250804

Police Station

A DIVISION POLICE STATION - PATAN DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHIL MADHUBEN KESHAJI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patan convicted the defendant Madhubben under Section 65-AA of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for possessing country liquor on 27/11/2025. The court imposed a fine of ₹200 and sentenced her to 2 days simple imprisonment in default of fine, considering her guilty plea, poor economic status, and family responsibilities. The confiscated liquor was ordered to be destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 694/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patan convicted the defendant Madhubben under Section 65-AA of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for possessing country liquor on 27/11/2025. The court imposed a fine of ₹200 and sentenced her to 2 days simple imprisonment in default of fine, considering her guilty plea, poor economic status, and family responsibilities. The confiscated liquor was ordered to be destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case