Government of Gujarat vs PANCHAL DHAVALKUMAR VIKRAMBHAI ISHAVARLAL — 687/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPT020008752026

Filing Number

687/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

687/2026

Registration Date

06-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT PATAN

Judge

11-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11217019250869

Police Station

A DIVISION POLICE STATION - PATAN DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PANCHAL DHAVALKUMAR VIKRAMBHAI ISHAVARLAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patan convicted the accused, Dhavalkumar Vikrambhai Ishwarbhai Panchal, under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code for obstructing public passage by placing his vegetable cart on a public road on 08/12/2025. The court, considering the accused's poverty, first-time offense, remorse, and family responsibilities, imposed a fine of ₹500 instead of imprisonment, with three days simple imprisonment as the alternative if the fine is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 687/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patan convicted the accused, Dhavalkumar Vikrambhai Ishwarbhai Panchal, under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code for obstructing public passage by placing his vegetable cart on a public road on 08/12/2025. The court, considering the accused's poverty, first-time offense, remorse, and family responsibilities, imposed a fine of ₹500 instead of imprisonment, with three days simple imprisonment as the alternative if the fine is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case