SHEKH YUNUSHBHAI SHAKURBHAI vs WAYLORI TRAVEL AND TOURISM PRIVATE LTD — 118/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJPT020007682026

Filing Number

118/2026

Filing Date

29-Jan-2026

Registration No

118/2026

Registration Date

29-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT PATAN

Judge

11-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHEKH YUNUSHBHAI SHAKURBHAI

    Adv. K H PATANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.WAYLORI TRAVEL AND TOURISM PRIVATE LTD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patan allowed the applicant's petition under Section 503 of BNSS and directed the refund of Rs. 24,000/- (out of Rs. 30,000/- defrauded) that was frozen in multiple bank accounts following a cyber crime complaint. The court found the frozen accounts were fake/fraudulent, no FIR was registered, no account holders objected, and the Investigating Officer recommended refund, making the applicant eligible for interim custody of the money upon furnishing a personal bond and surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 118/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patan allowed the applicant's petition under Section 503 of BNSS and directed the refund of Rs. 24,000/- (out of Rs. 30,000/- defrauded) that was frozen in multiple bank accounts following a cyber crime complaint. The court found the frozen accounts were fake/fraudulent, no FIR was registered, no account holders objected, and the Investigating Officer recommended refund, making the applicant eligible for interim custody of the money upon furnishing a personal bond and surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case