MODI RINKESH DINESHKUMAR vs AXIS BANK — 117/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJPT020007672026

Filing Number

117/2026

Filing Date

29-Jan-2026

Registration No

117/2026

Registration Date

29-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT PATAN

Judge

11-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MODI RINKESH DINESHKUMAR

    Adv. H G SANDESARA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AXIS BANK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Patan Chief Judicial Magistrate allowed the applicant's petition under Section 503 of BNSS to recover Rs. 4,990 that was fraudulently withdrawn from his Equitas Bank account in a cyber crime and subsequently frozen in a suspect Axis Bank account. The court directed the bank to refund the amount upon the applicant furnishing a personal bond and surety of 1.5 times the amount, with conditions that the money must be produced before the court if demanded and returned if any other person establishes a legitimate claim to it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 117/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Patan Chief Judicial Magistrate allowed the applicant's petition under Section 503 of BNSS to recover Rs. 4,990 that was fraudulently withdrawn from his Equitas Bank account in a cyber crime and subsequently frozen in a suspect Axis Bank account. The court directed the bank to refund the amount upon the applicant furnishing a personal bond and surety of 1.5 times the amount, with conditions that the money must be produced before the court if demanded and returned if any other person establishes a legitimate claim to it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case