PATEL HITESH DINESHBHAI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 112/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJPT020007532026
Filing Number
112/2026
Filing Date
28-Jan-2026
Registration No
112/2026
Registration Date
28-Jan-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT PATAN
Judge
11-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 03-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PATEL HITESH DINESHBHAI
Adv. U G KELA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
-
2.AXIS BANK
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: The Patan Chief Judicial Magistrate allowed the applicant's Section 503 BNSS application to recover Rs. 9,599/- that was fraudulently withdrawn via cyber crime and frozen in a fake Axis Bank account. The court directed refund of the amount to the applicant's Bank of Baroda account upon furnishing personal bond and surety of one-and-half times the frozen amount, with conditions that the money be produced if demanded and returned if any other claimant proves ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Order/Judgement
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Reply Of I.O.
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Reply Of I.O.
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
09-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 112/2026
Summary: The Patan Chief Judicial Magistrate allowed the applicant's Section 503 BNSS application to recover Rs. 9,599/- that was fraudulently withdrawn via cyber crime and frozen in a fake Axis Bank account. The court directed refund of the amount to the applicant's Bank of Baroda account upon furnishing personal bond and surety of one-and-half times the frozen amount, with conditions that the money be produced if demanded and returned if any other claimant proves ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts