PATEL HITESH DINESHBHAI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 112/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJPT020007532026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
112/2026
Filing Date
28-01-2026
Registration No
112/2026
Registration Date
28-01-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT PATAN
Judge
11-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PATEL HITESH DINESHBHAI
Adv. U G KELA
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
AXIS BANK
Hearing History
Judge: 11-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER/JUDGEMENT
REPLY OF I.O.
REPLY OF I.O.
REPLY OF I.O.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-03-2026 | ORDER/JUDGEMENT | |
| 07-03-2026 | REPLY OF I.O. | |
| 24-02-2026 | REPLY OF I.O. | |
| 09-02-2026 | REPLY OF I.O. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Patan Chief Judicial Magistrate allowed the applicant's Section 503 BNSS application to recover Rs. 9,599/- that was fraudulently withdrawn via cyber crime and frozen in a fake Axis Bank account. The court directed refund of the amount to the applicant's Bank of Baroda account upon furnishing personal bond and surety of one-and-half times the frozen amount, with conditions that the money be produced if demanded and returned if any other claimant proves ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Patan Chief Judicial Magistrate allowed the applicant's Section 503 BNSS application to recover Rs. 9,599/- that was fraudulently withdrawn via cyber crime and frozen in a fake Axis Bank account. The court directed refund of the amount to the applicant's Bank of Baroda account upon furnishing personal bond and surety of one-and-half times the frozen amount, with conditions that the money be produced if demanded and returned if any other claimant proves ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts