THAKOR CHHOTAJI MAGANJI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 111/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJPT020007522026

Filing Number

111/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

111/2026

Registration Date

28-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT PATAN

Judge

11-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

1.THAKOR CHHOTAJI MAGANJI

Adv. U G KELA

Respondent(s)

1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
2.CANARA BANK(INCLUDING SYNDICATE BANK)

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
25-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patan allowed the applicant's Section 503 BNSS application and ordered the refund of Rs. 5,000/- that was fraudulently withdrawn via cybercrime and frozen in a fake bank account. The court directed the bank to transfer the amount back to the applicant's original account upon furnishing a personal bond and surety, subject to conditions including non-use in any offense and production before court if demanded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
25-Mar-2026

Disposed

Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
17-Mar-2026

Order/Judgement

Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
07-Mar-2026

Reply Of I.O.

Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
24-Feb-2026

Reply Of I.O.

Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
09-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
28-Jan-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 111/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patan allowed the applicant's Section 503 BNSS application and ordered the refund of Rs. 5,000/- that was fraudulently withdrawn via cybercrime and frozen in a fake bank account. The court directed the bank to transfer the amount back to the applicant's original account upon furnishing a personal bond and surety, subject to conditions including non-use in any offense and production before court if demanded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.