THAKOR ROHITKUMAR PRATAPJI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 110/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJPT020007502026

Filing Number

110/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

110/2026

Registration Date

28-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT PATAN

Judge

11-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

1.THAKOR ROHITKUMAR PRATAPJI

Adv. U G KELA

Respondent(s)

1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
2.BANK OF INDIA
3.AXIS BANK
4.BANK OF BARODA(INCLDING VIJAYA BANK AND DENA BANK)
5.STATE BANK OF INDIA

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
25-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

Court Decision Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patan allowed the applicant's application under Section 503 of BNSS and directed refund of Rs. 10,000/- that was fraudulently withdrawn via cyber crime and frozen in multiple bank accounts. The court found the frozen bank accounts were fake, no FIR was lodged, and only the victim claimed the money, justifying its return upon furnishing personal bond and surety of 1.5 times the amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
25-Mar-2026

Disposed

Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
17-Mar-2026

Order/Judgement

Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
07-Mar-2026

Reply Of I.O.

Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
24-Feb-2026

Reply Of I.O.

Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
09-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
28-Jan-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 110/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patan allowed the applicant's application under Section 503 of BNSS and directed refund of Rs. 10,000/- that was fraudulently withdrawn via cyber crime and frozen in multiple bank accounts. The court found the frozen bank accounts were fake, no FIR was lodged, and only the victim claimed the money, justifying its return upon furnishing personal bond and surety of 1.5 times the amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.