THAKOR KAILASHBEN CHANDUJI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 109/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJPT020007492026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
109/2026
Filing Date
28-01-2026
Registration No
109/2026
Registration Date
28-01-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT PATAN
Judge
11-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THAKOR KAILASHBEN CHANDUJI
Adv. U G KELA
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK
BANK OF MAHARASHTRA
KARANATAKA BANK LTD
IDBI BANK
Hearing History
Judge: 11-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER/JUDGEMENT
REPLY OF I.O.
REPLY OF I.O.
REPLY OF I.O.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-03-2026 | ORDER/JUDGEMENT | |
| 07-03-2026 | REPLY OF I.O. | |
| 24-02-2026 | REPLY OF I.O. | |
| 09-02-2026 | REPLY OF I.O. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patan allowed the applicant's petition under Section 503 of the BNSS and ordered the refund of Rs. 22,000 that had been frozen in multiple bank accounts following a cybercrime complaint. The court found the applicant was the victim of a cyber fraud where Rs. 34,301 was withdrawn from her Bank of Baroda account, and the investigating officer confirmed the frozen accounts were fake with no legitimate claimants. The refund was granted on condition that the applicant furnish a personal bond and surety of 1.5 times the frozen amount, with directives to the banks to transfer the money within 10 days of receiving police notification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patan allowed the applicant's petition under Section 503 of the BNSS and ordered the refund of Rs. 22,000 that had been frozen in multiple bank accounts following a cybercrime complaint. The court found the applicant was the victim of a cyber fraud where Rs. 34,301 was withdrawn from her Bank of Baroda account, and the investigating officer confirmed the frozen accounts were fake with no legitimate claimants. The refund was granted on condition that the applicant furnish a personal bond and surety of 1.5 times the frozen amount, with directives to the banks to transfer the money within 10 days of receiving police notification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts