Government of Gujarat vs THAKOR MAHENDRAJI KAPURJI — 250/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPT020003082026
Filing Number
250/2026
Filing Date
08-Jan-2026
Registration No
250/2026
Registration Date
08-Jan-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT PATAN
Judge
11-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 16-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11217019250685
Police Station
A DIVISION POLICE STATION - PATAN DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.THAKOR MAHENDRAJI KAPURJI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary: The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patan convicted the accused Thakur Mehendraj under Gujarat Prohibition Act Sections 66(1)(B) and 85(1) for public intoxication on 10/10/2025. The accused voluntarily confessed to the charges, and considering mitigating circumstances including his impoverished status, remorse, and this being his first offense, the court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 300 with three days simple imprisonment in default of payment, applying a lenient approach below the statutory minimum under precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 250/2026
Summary: The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patan convicted the accused Thakur Mehendraj under Gujarat Prohibition Act Sections 66(1)(B) and 85(1) for public intoxication on 10/10/2025. The accused voluntarily confessed to the charges, and considering mitigating circumstances including his impoverished status, remorse, and this being his first offense, the court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 300 with three days simple imprisonment in default of payment, applying a lenient approach below the statutory minimum under precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts