Government of Gujarat vs THAKOR JIVANJI KURSHIJI — 211/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPT020002572026

Filing Number

211/2026

Filing Date

07-Jan-2026

Registration No

211/2026

Registration Date

07-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT PATAN

Judge

11-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THAKOR JIVANJI KURSHIJI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court of Patan convicted the defendant under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1), for public intoxication on 13/09/2025. The court imposed a fine of Rs. 300 with alternative simple imprisonment of 3 days, considering the defendant's voluntary confession, impoverished status, and remorse as mitigating factors warranting leniency below the statutory minimum punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 07-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 211/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court of Patan convicted the defendant under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1), for public intoxication on 13/09/2025. The court imposed a fine of Rs. 300 with alternative simple imprisonment of 3 days, considering the defendant's voluntary confession, impoverished status, and remorse as mitigating factors warranting leniency below the statutory minimum punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case