PANCHAL MAYURIBEN W/o NARESHKUMAR vs ABHISHEK A S — 36/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJPT020002092026

Filing Number

36/2026

Filing Date

07-Jan-2026

Registration No

36/2026

Registration Date

07-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT PATAN

Judge

11-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PANCHAL MAYURIBEN W/o NARESHKUMAR

    Adv. U G KELA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ABHISHEK A S

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Patan Chief Judicial Magistrate allowed the applicant's Section 503 BNSS application and ordered refund of Rs. 14,804.15/- that was frozen in a suspect bank account after the applicant fell victim to a cyber fraud involving Rs. 38,000/-. The court granted the refund on condition that the applicant furnish a personal bond and surety, with the amount to be returned only if no other claimant proves rightful ownership, and subject to production before the court as needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  7. 21-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 07-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 36/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Patan Chief Judicial Magistrate allowed the applicant's Section 503 BNSS application and ordered refund of Rs. 14,804.15/- that was frozen in a suspect bank account after the applicant fell victim to a cyber fraud involving Rs. 38,000/-. The court granted the refund on condition that the applicant furnish a personal bond and surety, with the amount to be returned only if no other claimant proves rightful ownership, and subject to production before the court as needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case