PANCHAL MAYURIBEN W/o NARESHKUMAR vs LALIT KUMAR — 35/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJPT020002082026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

35/2026

Filing Date

07-01-2026

Registration No

35/2026

Registration Date

07-01-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT PATAN

Judge

11-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 503,

Petitioner(s)

PANCHAL MAYURIBEN W/o NARESHKUMAR

Adv. U G KELA

Respondent(s)

LALIT KUMAR

RAJSTHAN STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION

JAYA SINGH D/o ASHOK SINGH

Hearing History

Judge: 11-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE

07-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

ORDER/JUDGEMENT

16-02-2026

REPLY OF I.O.

03-02-2026

REPLY OF I.O.

21-01-2026

REPLY OF I.O.

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
ORDER

Court Decision Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patan allowed the applicant's petition under Section 503 of BNSS and ordered the refund of Rs. 75,193/- that was frozen in suspect bank accounts following a cyber crime complaint filed on the Ashwast Project helpline. The court found that no FIR was lodged, the bank accounts were fake, and no other claimant came forward, making the applicant entitled to recovery. The refund was granted on conditions of furnishing personal bond and surety equal to 1.5 times the frozen amount, with restrictions on its use and production before court if required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patan allowed the applicant's petition under Section 503 of BNSS and ordered the refund of Rs. 75,193/- that was frozen in suspect bank accounts following a cyber crime complaint filed on the Ashwast Project helpline. The court found that no FIR was lodged, the bank accounts were fake, and no other claimant came forward, making the applicant entitled to recovery. The refund was granted on conditions of furnishing personal bond and surety equal to 1.5 times the frozen amount, with restrictions on its use and production before court if required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT PATAN All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case