Government of Gujarat vs CHAUHAN VIJAYKUMAR SABURBHAI HIRABHAI — 79/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPT020001352025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
79/2025
Filing Date
09-01-2025
Registration No
79/2025
Registration Date
09-01-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT PATAN
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11217020241078
Police Station
B DIVISION POLICE STATION - PATAN DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
CHAUHAN VIJAYKUMAR SABURBHAI HIRABHAI
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 14-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 07-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patan convicted the accused, Vijaykumar Saburbhai Chauhan, under Gujarat Prohibition Act Sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) for consuming alcohol in public without permit. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹300 with 7 days simple imprisonment in default, and ordered his existing bail bond to continue for six months under BNS Section 481, considering his first-time offense, poor financial condition, and genuine remorse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Patan convicted the accused, Vijaykumar Saburbhai Chauhan, under Gujarat Prohibition Act Sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) for consuming alcohol in public without permit. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹300 with 7 days simple imprisonment in default, and ordered his existing bail bond to continue for six months under BNS Section 481, considering his first-time offense, poor financial condition, and genuine remorse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts